Maybe this part of email leads to my reaction :
For a group of people, who took the time to draw a bunch of cartoons to explain that they view security as something very very important, to fumble so badly, is really... sad. OpenBSD is drawing bunch of cartoons too,not mainly about security,but security is number one for OpenBSD.If this part is about Google,than I made mistake and I'm sorry for my reaction.Everyone can make mistake.Now I must learn from it. -----Original Message----- From: Mark Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 10:54 AM To: misc@openbsd.org Cc: Tomas Bodzar Subject: Re: Disappointment: New browser - *sigh* Tomas Bodzar wrote: > Eh????? > > What about New browser are you talking? ;-) I don't know,that lynx(1) > which is in base (! ;-)) has option about:plugins . > All others are not in base,just option and every user of OpenBSD know,that > he/she must be careful about installing SW,which is not in base. > > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html > > especially this part is maybe too hard for someone to understand : > > The packages and ports collection does NOT go through the same thorough > security audit that is performed on the OpenBSD base system. Although we > strive to keep the quality of the packages collection high, we just do not > have enough human resources to ensure the same level of robustness and > security. Of course security updates for various applications are committed > to the ports tree as soon as possible, and corresponding package security > updates are made available as snapshots for -current. > > But maybe not every user as I read your mail. > Wtf is wrong with you ? The more I read your mails on this list the more you look like a lost soul to me. As you're a noob to OpenBSD you might consider keeping advices to yourself for a little while. He's talking about G**gle Chr*me which is not in ports. BTW do you know what OT means ? If you don't understand a discussion then don't spam. VADE RETRO TOMAS
