Stefan Sczekalla wrote:
Hi Lurent,
e.g. :
you join two companies ( lets name them "A" and "B" ) using overlapping
private adress-space.
Lets assume "A" has a Fileserver.A at 192.168.2.1.
Users on Company B like to acces Fileserver.A using - but at "B" they
have their Mailserver.B at 192.168.2.1.
So the network form Company A needs to be hidden behind NAT so that
192.168.2.1 at A is accessed by something else from B using e.g.
192.168.202.1. ( or any other feasible address ).
And beause "A" has several 1000 Systems which should be accessed by "B"
it would be a big deal when querying the DNS from A - would lead to a
response with a NATted IP-Address "B" could use instead the "real" A
IP-Address which are paritally in use at "B" too.
I think your best option is to use bind views.
Don't you think so ?
