On 2008-11-02, Steven Surdock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I must be missing something then. Why not use 4.3.2.2 as the carp > interface IP and no IP address on the physical interfaces? I'm not sure > how well this will play with OpenBGPD, someone else will have to chime > in there.
I haven't tried it, but that (i.e. only assigning the address to carp, and using carpdev) should work ok with bgpd. You'll only be able to run a session from whichever router is carp master, but unless you're able to either talk the upstream out of another /30, or use one of your own /30 for the second link to the ISP, that's the price you have to pay.
