On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ** Please honour reply-to: ports@ ** > > On 2008-11-10, Gregory Edigarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: >>> Are there any plans on bumping net/quagga to 0.99.11? I tried to >>> compile it myself, from the vanilla sources while applying the >>> following two patches: >>> >> Are you sure you still want to run that piece of shit(quagga)? >> There is much much better realization of routing protocols readily >> available to you in the base system. >> > > quagga does some things you can't do with base OS, and it's > useful to have a second implementation in ports to test against. > > the quagga we have now definitely needs an update, a lot changed > since 0.99.6. > > felipe, please send *dmesg output* (why do we have to ask for > this every time!) and details of your config and what you're > running. ifconfig -A might help too. which daemon is it that > has the fault? check the logs (use verbose logging), do you > get any log output before it dies first?
BTW, if anybody is interested, I have a patch to bring quagga up to 0.99.11. Not very well tested so far (only lightly). -- http://www.felipe-alfaro.org/blog/disclaimer/
