On 2008-11-28, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:38:33 +0700, Stuart Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> On 2008-11-27, Insan Praja SW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> em0 at pci3 dev 0 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82573E)" rev 0x03: irq >>> 9, address 00:15:17:49:03:b3 >>> em1 at pci4 dev 1 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82540EM)" rev 0x02: irq >>> 11, address 00:07:e9:0f:44:ac >>> em2 at pci4 dev 5 function 0 "Intel PRO/1000MT (82541GI)" rev 0x05: irq >>> 9, address 00:15:17:49:03:b4 >> >> It may be a complete red herring, but can you try disconnecting these >> to see if it only affects one of them? I would start with the 82573E >> (I would guess it may be onboard, if so there's probably somewhere >> in BIOS you can disable it). >> > > I see what I can do.. but disable one of these nics, I dont think I can't > afford that. It's a router and I need that interface.
The 82573E is fairly uncommon, I don't think there are too many people who can test this. I've been trying to find systems it fails on (because I have a few routers with em(4) in them and I need to check they'll be ok before I upgrade them - always wise, but doubly so around the time of a hackathon especially when it has specifically involved work on this driver) and haven't yet seen a problem.
