On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 03:05:14PM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
| Paul de Weerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > So I'd disagree with your 'by definition' (given the counterexample),
| > but sadly there is not enough native v6 around and we have to resort
| > to nasty hacks (tunneling). As much as I appreciate the likes of
| > SixXS, I really wish they were not required anymore ;)
|
| In a world where PPP-over-Ethernet-over-ATM is the norm, adding an
| "IPv6 transport protocol" layer isn't all that absurd.
Please tell ISP's ;)
Seriously, when looking for a new ISP, ask about v6. Even if you have
no use for it yourself (yet!).
Paul 'WEiRD' de Weerd
--
>++++++++[<++++++++++>-]<+++++++.>+++[<------>-]<.>+++[<+
+++++++++++>-]<.>++[<------------>-]<+.--------------.[-]
http://www.weirdnet.nl/
