On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 6:26 AM, a b <rclo...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> First post here, so please be gentle.....;-)
>
> Let's get the
> environmentals out of the way first :
> -- OpenBSD 4.4 on i386 architecture
> --
> All errata up to and including 008 (14 Jan 2009) installed
>
> Here's what I'm
> seeing (IP addresses obfuscated to protect the innocent) :
>
> (1)  ATTEMPT 1
> The following in pf.conf
>
> table <my_mgmt_net2>  const
> {10.0.170.0/24,172.16.200.70,172.16.100.98,192.168.155.174}
> table
> <my_mgmt_net2>   persist
>
> I observe the following behaviour :
>
> pfctl -t
> my_mgmt_net2 -T show  returns nothing
> pfctl -vvsTables does not list
> my_mgmt_net2
>
> (2) ATTEMPT 2
>
> The following in pf.conf
>
> table <my_mgmt_net2>
> {10.0.170.0/24,172.16.200.70,172.16.100.98,192.168.155.174}
> table
> <my_mgmt_net2>   persist
>
> I observe the following behaviour :
>
> pfctl -t
> my_mgmt_net2 -T show  returns nothing
> pfctl -vvsTables DOES list my_mgmt_net2
> Am I doing something incredibly silly, or is there a bug in the works ?
>
> Bye
> for now !


You're declaring the same table twice in each case. What you want is:

table <my_mgmt_net2> const persist
{10.0.170.0/24,172.16.200.70,172.16.100.98,192.168.155.174}

-HKS

Reply via email to