I'd gladly trade look(1) for wake(8). That's almost 8k right there.
On 2/9/09, Emilio Perea <epe...@walkereng.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 09:05:13PM +1300, Richard Toohey wrote: >> On 9/02/2009, at 6:31 PM, Thomas Pfaff wrote: >> >>> I think this could use some explaining for those of us that are not >>> intimately involved in development or have been around here for that >>> long. Keeping it small and simple by saying no to adding one file >>> at 7.2K? I'd really like to know the rationale on this one. >>> >>> Thanks. >> >> My guess would be that I want this 10K util, you want that 7.2K util, >> Fred wants that 20K util, and every Tom, Dick, and Harry wants >> their n K ... who gets to make the rules, who gets to administer it, >> etc.? >> (Who gets to listen to everyone arguing why this or that should go in?) >> >> And guess there may be ramifications for install media? > > If there is no room in base, it would be nice to have it in ports. Or > is there something else in ports already that does the same thing? I've > found wake extremely useful for turning on remote desktop computers from > the Soekris firewall rather than leaving them on all the time.
