On Tue, March 3, 2009 18:30, Fred Crowson wrote: > On 3/3/09, Nenhum_de_Nos <math...@eternamente.info> wrote: >> >> On Mon, March 2, 2009 21:04, Fred Crowson wrote: >>> What's the output of: ifconfig -a ? >> >> # ifconfig -a >> lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 33204 >> groups: lo >> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 >> vr0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> lladdr 00:11:85:e3:2a:17 >> groups: egress >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex) >> status: active >> inet6 fe80::211:85ff:fee3:2a17%vr0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 >> inet 10.1.1.90 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 >> enc0: flags=0<> mtu 1536 >> aue0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 >> lladdr 00:60:6e:00:18:c0 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (none) >> status: no carrier > ^^^^^^^^^^ > If the status is no carrier then that usually implies a cabling issue. > > Not sure if this is your problem. > > HTH > > Fred
thanks for asnwering, but it is not. this ifconfig was taken when I put the cable on the other nic to access and send you what you wanted :) I'd be really glad if that was my problem :) thanks, matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be
