> > If everyone continues to avoid IPv6, then it will remain less than > > useful. I understand IPv6 has less than 1% uptake at the moment, but I > > don't understand why employing it (in addition to IPv4 NATing hacks) is > > "about the least smart" thing an ISP could do? > > > > Is it a cost issue? > > no, a lack of brain issue. v6 is broken by design in a thousand ways > and way worse than you can imagine. of course it has been detailed > here numerous times.
So what are you going to do when all of IPv4 is exhausted? Do you have all the IPs you need so it won't matter? -- Garry Dolley ARP Networks, Inc. http://www.arpnetworks.com Data center, VPS, and IP transit solutions (818) 206-0181 Member Los Angeles County REACT, Unit 336 WQGK336 Blog http://scie.nti.st
