Those are my numbers.It was running during my normal work :
10 x Xterm in one of them is ogg123 playing song
1 x FF3 with 7 tabs
1 x Pidgin with 5 tabs
2 x rdesktop to Win servers
1 x ssh connection to company server
1 x vpnc
softdep is on on all partitions
I don't think that those numbers are bad,because ports.tar.gz has a
lot of small files.And I use OpenBSD for many good reasons like
stabitilty,security,quality,community and documentation.So if
sometimes it's slower then other OS's I don't care if it isn't a bug
;-)
$ uname -a
OpenBSD hexempo.eu.tieto.com 4.5 GENERIC.MP#78 i386
$
$ dd if=/dev/arandom of=test.dat bs=1024 count=10000
10000+0 records in
10000+0 records out
10240000 bytes transferred in 0.106 secs (96246029 bytes/sec)
$
$ time tar xzf ports.tar.gz
2m19.16s real 0m1.41s user 0m5.45s system
$
2009/4/23 Thomas Pfaff <tpf...@tp76.info>:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:40:53 +0200
> Claudio Jeker <cje...@diehard.n-r-g.com> wrote:
>> ext3 and ffs are very different. So the same thing may take a different
>> time to finish on either system because of different design decisions.
>> From your benchmark it seems your server's only purpose is to untar and
>> remove ports.tar.gz in a loop or what are you trying to show?
>
> It's my workstation and I'm not trying to show anything. B It was a
> simple observation I made and I was curious if there was something
> funny going on with my system, or if the performance difference in
> this particular case is considered normal.
>
>
--
http://www.openbsd.org/lyrics.html
