Cem Kayali wrote:
Thanks for reply...

Well, i checked that before, but also heard that 'when a system with a mounted, encrypted virtual filesystem is shutdown uncleanly, the encrypted virtual filesystem's structures get damaged and, since OpenBSD's fsck command will not currently acknowledge vnd filesystems, these damaged structures can not be repaired'

That was why i asked whether it is stable or whether there are alternate ways.



read the manpage for softraid and bioctl, it works similar to cgd: bioctl -c C -l <a RAID partition> softraid0. note that you can encrypt everything besides the root partition when installing from bsd.rd on the common architectures e.g. amd64.

svnd crypto is ancient. you can indeed fsck a filesystem on an encrypted svnd and it will take forever. if you have a large amount (>100 GB) of data to protect you may want to consider using something other than FFS as your file system due to the fsck time e.g. something with journaling or zero fsck time.


Thanks.


Christian Ruesch, 05/08/09 14:32:
Hello,

take a look at: mount_vnd(8).

Kind regards
Christian


On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:10:13PM +0300, Cem Kayali wrote:
Hello!

I've just registered to the list and i hope this is the right list to ask a question about OpenBSD.

I would like to ask whether OpenBSD has stable implementation of storing data in encrypted format, similar to FreeBSD geli and especially similar to NetBSD cgd... I have searched through Google and some maling lists and have found OpenBSD tutorials about creating an image and then, writing data into that image using svnd approach but same tutorials also say there is a problem with this if OpenBSD starts fsck while booting.

Is there currently alternative or better way? Or what would you suggest to protect data?


Thank you in advance.
Cem

Reply via email to