On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:08:33 -0400 "(private) HKS" <hks.priv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/5/18 Toma Bod ar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>: > > Common,you think that big western companies which have support from > > western governments care about it?And please don't make white knight > > from western civilization.Everywhere are pros and cons.What type of > > copyright and intellectual property you think?Like Disney which have > > stories based on older stories,but he has law from government on it > > now so original makers has nothing and Disney takes all?And when end > > of this copyright is near some "magic" happen in government and Disney > > (and others) has next 20 or 50 years.Sounds very respectable for > > copyright and intellectual property of original authors ;-) > > > > Or maybe you think something like we have.When you create your own > > song and sing it to people somewhere outside of your flat you must pay > > to OSA(something like BSA terrorists,but local).WTH is that.Sounds > > really like care about my copyright - I must pay for my own song ;-) > > > > Informations are here for share and we can move forward thanks to > > them.If some idiot have patent on double-click then what?One developer > > must incorporated triple-click to his product,next four-click and so > > on?Sounds like history - Earth is just pancake and everyone who want > > to find another idea must use our idea or he will be killed and who > > use our idea without our licence will be killed too.Really we need > > those times back?????? > > For Christ's sake, get off your fucking high horse. My quip was in > response to your implication that China chose a BSD license because it > fit better with their intentions than GPL or similar. As if they gave > a shit. > Actually I think their decision was quite telling. The Chinese Gove is not unaware of intellectual property concerns, they just don't give a shit for western idiots who patent wonton balls. Dhu > -HKS > > > > > > 2009/5/18 (private) HKS <hks.priv...@gmail.com>: > >> 2009/5/17 Toma Bod ar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>: > >>> I know,that's why they choose BSD-style licenced OS ;-) > >> > >> Yes, because China's respect for copyright and intellectual property > >> is legendary. > >> > >> -HKS > >> > >> > >>> 2009/5/17 Cem Kayali <cemkay...@eticaret.com.tr>: > >>>> > >>>> Do you really think Chineese governmnt make source public? Not all of > >> course > >>>> ;) > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Jesus Sanchez, 05/17/09 20:58: > >>>>> > >>>>> TomC!E! BodE>C!r escribiC3: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> After quick search on web it looks like it's based on FreeBSD 5.3 > >>>>>> (initial version) with Windows like GUI.So it doesn't looks so secure > >>>>>> now :-) But government agencies must have reason to receive money so > >>>>>> why don't make "wave" about dangerous China with their new > >>>>>> ultra-hyper-super secure system? Ofcourse that there can be > >>>>>> interesting modifications.Maybe I will try it in Qemu :-) > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> the chinese government really feels so vulnerable against U.S.? > >>>>> i mean, they say it like "the WWIII will begin soon and we need > >>>>> to defend us on the cyberspace with our super-secure OS" > >>>>> > >>>>> and after all they based it on FreeBSD? I'm a OpenBSD user and > >>>>> I really feel that I've enought privacy, don't need a > >>>>> super-secret-ultra-secure OS > >>>>> nor to say "Made In China" xD > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> Dne 17. kvD ten 2009 19:28 TomC!E! BodE>C!r <tomas.bod...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> napsal(a): > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Everyone can try it > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> > http://www.honeytechblog.com/downlod-kylin-operating-system-by-chinaqingbo-wu > >>>>>> / > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 2009/5/17 Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I just noticed this: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://www.physorg.com/news161355225.html > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> about a "secure" os that's been under > >>>>>>>> development in China since around 2k > >>>>>>>> and is now being deployed by the Chinese > >>>>>>>> Gov. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Interestingly, it is built for a "hardened" > >>>>>>>> CPU that, I'd guess, lacks many of the advanced > >>>>>>>> "features" of iNTel architecture cpus. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Anybody have any more info on this? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Dhu
