On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:45 AM, ropers<rop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Of course, depending on your circumstances it may be more economical > to just chuck the suspect RAM instead of wasting 24 hours. And > granted, YMMV. But if anyone has ever seen any faulty RAM whose > problems a 24hr burn-in test with memtest86+ could not detect, I'd be > very interested in hearing that. > > regards, > --ropers > >
I have seen errors appear after more than 24 hours: 36 or 48 hours. Yes, it can happen. Cheers, -- Mattieu Baptiste "/earth is 102% full ... please delete anyone you can."
