On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Denis Doroshenko
<denis.doroshe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 1/14/10, nixlists <nixmli...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Does it have the same reliability features as qmail on an FS without
>>  softupdates? What about with softupdates?
>>
>>  http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html
>
> the very link you just provided contains the following sentence:
>
> Do not use async or softupdates filesystems.


Sorry, forget I mentioned softupdates. Does it do what qmail does?
Reliaibility-wise?

"qmail's queue, except for bounce message contents, is crashproof on
the BSD FFS and most of its variants. "

Reply via email to