On 17Apr2009 07:48, uno83 <johan.unos...@gmail.com> wrote: | Agung T. Apriyanto-2 wrote: | > i found mismatch output from snmpwalk in -current net-snmp, sample bellow | > | > r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost | > .1.3.6.1.2.1.4.20.1.2 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.0.1 = INTEGER: 1 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.66.1 = INTEGER: 5 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.67.1 = INTEGER: 6 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.68.1 = INTEGER: 7 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.10.100.69.1 = INTEGER: 8 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.58.145.172.241 = INTEGER: 2 | > IP-MIB::ipAdEntIfIndex.127.0.0.1 = INTEGER: 4 | > | > r...@cadangan[patches]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public localhost | > .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3 | > IF-MIB::ifType.1 = INTEGER: softwareLoopback(24) | > IF-MIB::ifType.2 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | > IF-MIB::ifType.3 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | > IF-MIB::ifType.4 = INTEGER: 244 | > IF-MIB::ifType.5 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | > IF-MIB::ifType.6 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | > IF-MIB::ifType.7 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | > IF-MIB::ifType.8 = INTEGER: ethernetCsmacd(6) | > IF-MIB::ifType.9 = INTEGER: 245 | > | > interface index 5,6,7,8 have the right ip, but there's a mismatch at | > index 1, 2 and 4 of IP-MIB. | > | > any of you have the same problems ? | | We are seeing the same problem.
Me too, using net-snmp on OpenBSD 4.5. How is the base OS snmpd in 4.5? It was insufficient back on 4.3 and I ended up using net-snmp, but we recently added another NIC to the box and now net-snmp reports no interfaces at all:-( Am trying today to upgrade (or re-install) to 4.5 on this box to match our working equivalent box (redundant pair of machine with staggered install times, hence the mismatch), but of course the AMD64 install CD doesn't boot :-( Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> DoD#743
