wow what a useful comparison. On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:04:45PM -0300, VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO wrote: > > OpenBSD does more when running each process for security reasons and so > > is arguably slower than Linux, but also does less by default and so is > > faster than most distros. It's still blisteringly fast, especially where > > it counts and if I had to choose one OS to use it would be OpenBSD. > > > > I informally compared Slackware with OpenBSD. Slackware boots faster, > but OpenBSD uses only 6mb of memory, while Slackware consumes something > around 50mb. (Right after the boot, without X, default setup)
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default?... VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as def... Dexter Tomisson
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... Tomas Bodzar
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... Lars Nooden
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... Jure Pečar
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... Tomas Bodzar
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... Jacob Yocom-Piatt
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... Stuart Henderson
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.... Kevin Chadwick
- Re: low httpd performance. Apach... VICTOR TARABOLA CORTIANO
- Re: low httpd performance. ... Marco Peereboom
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as def... Scott McEachern
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as default?... Tomas Bodzar
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as def... Pekka Niiranen
- Re: low httpd performance. Apache 2.2 as... John Wright