On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 08:17:29PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote: > On Sun, May 09, 2010 at 04:49:26PM +0200, Nicolas P. M. Legrand wrote: > > Hello, > > > > received the CDs on friday, a very nice moment as always, thanks > > everyone :-). > > > > I saw minor typos in upgrade47.html while upgrading, useless prompt, > > useless sudo and use of obsolete -F pkg_add flag: > > > > Index: upgrade47.html > > =================================================================== > > RCS file: /cvs/openbsd/www/faq/upgrade47.html,v > > retrieving revision 1.8 > > diff -u -r1.8 upgrade47.html > > --- upgrade47.html 6 May 2010 01:36:59 -0000 1.8 > > +++ upgrade47.html 9 May 2010 14:40:26 -0000 > > @@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ > > your $RELEASEPATH, run it with: > > > > <blockquote><pre> > > -# <b>sudo sysmerge -s $RELEASEPATH/etc47.tgz -x $RELEASEPATH/xetc47.tgz</b> > > +<b>sysmerge -s $RELEASEPATH/etc47.tgz -x $RELEASEPATH/xetc47.tgz</b> > > </pre></blockquote> > > > > this should either be "#" or "$ sudo", i think, which is how we normally > refer to prompts. i'm not sure whether that's a consistent faq thing too > though.
Sorry i didn't mention it has already been discussed for upgrade46.html: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=125696072511365&w=2 Nick then said: "Slapping a "sudo" in front of everything they contribute to the FAQ is some people's style, but not mine. And yes, the # in front is really annoying, since much of upgrade46.html (including that line) is intended to be copy/pasted. This is not true of most of the rest of the FAQ, where I generally DON'T want people to copy/paste blindly and ignorantly." reading upgrade47.html for the first time, i thought it must be a sort of copy/paste error and that I should mention it again. By the way maybe there is a better way to mention those kind of problem than posting on misc? regards, -- nicolas
