the last one wins * rh...@hushmail.com <rh...@hushmail.com> [2010-07-22 13:36]: > Hi, > > Could someone in the know confirm whether it is multiple announce > statements in bgpd.conf are considered a "legal" syntax by bgpd. > > Upon a recent config audit, I noticed I had the following two lines > applied to an iBGP group section : > announce all > announce none > > It appeared to do no harm, and bgpd -n -f did not complain. But > my feeling is that the config check should have failed ? I've now > removed the second statement (which was there purely for testing > prior to introduction of all, but never got commented out !). > > The above question broadly applies to 4.7-Release. > > Also, is there a way to hack bgpd.conf to send a neighbor, say > default route plus a filtered subset of all routes ? Or at least a > default plus all routes which the neighbor could then filter ? > > Thanks ! >
-- Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org BS Web Services, http://bsws.de Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting
