> From: Jacob Meuser <jake...@sdf.lonestar.org>
> Subject: Re: How to test if
sound is working?
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2010,
4:53 AM
> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 06:55:59PM
> -0800, James Hozier wrote:
> >
> From: Fred Crowson <fred.crow...@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: Re: How to test
if
> > sound is working?
> > > To: "James Hozier" <guitars...@yahoo.com>
> > >
Cc:
> > misc@openbsd.org
> > > Date: Monday, November 8, 2010, 10:55 PM
> > >
On 8 November
> > 2010 22:04, James
> > > Hozier <guitars...@yahoo.com>
> > >
wrote:
> > > >
> > > > $ cat
> > azalia_codec.c.rej
> > > > @@ -64,6 +64,13 @@
> > > > this->name = NULL;
> > > >
> > this->qrks = AZ_QRK_NONE;
> > >
> switch (this->vid) {
> > > > + case
> > 0x10134206:
> > > > +
this->name =
> "Cirrus
> > > Logic CS4206";
> > > > + if
> >
(this->subid ==
> > > 0x106b4d00) { /* APPLE_MBP55 */
> > > > +
>
> > >
> > this->qrks |= AZ_QRK_GPIO_UNMUTE_1 |
> > > > +
>
>
> >
> > AZ_QRK_GPIO_UNMUTE_3;
> > > > + }
> > > > + break;
> >
> > case
> > 0x10ec0260:
> > > > this->name =
> "Realtek
> > >
ALC260";
> > > > break;
> > > >
> > > > What does this mean? It looks
like a snippet
> of code
> > > from the original
> > patch
> > > file?
> > >
> > > Hi James,
> > >
> > > For some reason patch(1) did not insert the
> >
code into
> > > azalia_codec.c
> > > - I would guess that the reason was that
patch
> > file had
> > > some
> > > formatting that patch(1) did not like.
Have
> another go at
> > >
> > creating and
> > > patching the file, or you
can either manually add
> those 7
> > > new
> > lines to
> > > azailia_codec.c
after line 77 of azaila_codec.c
> > >
> > > Thus when you
> > rebuilt your
kernel - it did not have this
> > > new bit of code in.
> > >
> > > hth
> > >
> > >
> > Fred
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Hmm...added those lines to
azalia_codec.c after line
> 66 (without
> > the + signs in front
> > of the
lines), re-compiled and rebooted but still
> > nothing. I guess it's something
> > else, then...but I'm curious as to why the
> > patch didn't work.
>
>
>
judging by the formatting of your emails, the patch got
> mangled by
> your
mailer.
>
> inlining patches in email messages (as opposed to MIME
>
attachments)
> is part of OpenBSD culture.
>
> --
> jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
>
Yea, I don't
know why this formats weirdly. But in any case, I do know to at the very
least
to fix up the formatting in the patch file instead of just pasting the e-mail
into vi. For what it's worth, here's a small screenshot of what the file looks
like:
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/8076/201011090732251280x800s.png
