Hi,
"from 10.1.0.0/16" is the network id that I would negotiate with the remote
peer.
"(0.0.0.0/0)" is our real network, we have a lot of networks behind this
box.
We perform NAT on traffic leaving through the VPN tunnel.


192.168.71/24  0     10.1/16        0     0      W.X.Y.Z/esp/use/in
10.1/16        0     192.168.71/24  0     0      W.X.Y.Z/esp/require/out
Why this flow?
I would only flows defined in the configuration files.

Thanks
Andrea


On Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:39:33 -0800 (PST), Damon Schlosser
<damons...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 1. what is the (0.0.0.0/0) good for?2. how are you inspecting traffic in
> the
> tunnel?3. is nat allowed in the tunnel? 4. you may have let in more
> networks
> than you realize
> -damon
> 
> --- On Thu, 11/25/10, Andrea Parazzini <a.parazz...@sirtisistemi.net>
> wrote:
> 
> From: Andrea Parazzini <a.parazz...@sirtisistemi.net>
> Subject: ipsec vpn unexpected flow
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thursday, November 25, 2010, 2:40 PM
> 
> Hi,
> we have a vpn connection with a customer.
> The remote peer is not under our management.
> Our box is an OpenBSD 4.7 i386.
> We have configured the vpn as follows:
> 
> /etc/rc.conf.local
> ipsec=YES
> isakmpd_flags="-K -v"
> 
> /etc/ipsec.conf
> ike active esp tunnel \
>   from 10.1.0.0/16 (0.0.0.0/0) to 192.168.90.0/24 \
>   local A.B.C.D peer W.X.Y.Z \
>   main auth hmac-sha1 enc 3des group modp1024 \
>   quick auth hmac-sha1 enc 3des group modp1024 \
>   psk "PRESHAREDKEY"
> 
> 
> The vpn works fine, but there is a strange thing.
> Whith "netstat -nrf encap" I see something like:
> 
> Source         Port  Destination    Port  Proto  SA
> 192.168.71/24  0     10.1/16        0     0      W.X.Y.Z/esp/use/in
> 10.1/16        0     192.168.71/24  0     0      W.X.Y.Z/esp/require/out
> 192.168.90/24  0     default        0     0      W.X.Y.Z/esp/use/in
> default        0     192.168.90/24  0     0      W.X.Y.Z/esp/require/out
> 
> As you can see there is a flow that is not configured on our box.
> It is probably configured on the remote peer.
> Is a normal behavior?
> How can I protect myself from an incorrect configuration on the remote
> peer?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrea

Reply via email to