On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:03 PM, Corey <clinge...@gmail.com> wrote: <snip> > Debate indeed; it potentially creates new problems. B See here > (http://dnscurve.org/nsec3walker.html) and here > (http://dnscurve.org/amplification.html) for examples. B It's Dan Bernstein's > writing, so it's definitely an alternate viewpoint :) B But what he says is > interesting on paper, though his scheme could end up the Betamax to DNSSEC's > VHS. > > Corey > >
I agree there is room for debate on which is a better approach (dnscurve or dnssec) however dnssec seems to have the wider adoption as of now and I would like to support it and I thank everyone for the suggestions of using unbound from ports. Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com phone: 304.237.9369(c)
