On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 10:22:19AM +0200, Mihai Popescu wrote: > Hello Henning, > > I wasn't aware that I need permission to continue a thread. > Excuse me for my missunderstanding, but think I'm not involved in the > release and compile procedures. If you don't like to answer, please > don't. > As a matter of fact, most of list users preffer to joke and to write > something else, usually off- topic. Like some of you want to cover > something and move away from the real answer. > > Ok, no problem. I know I'm far from knowing about OpenBSD, but I'm > trying. That's why I'm not polluting the other "technical" lists with > my questions. So I jumped in misc, but I see now there are some "what > to ask and what not to" rules. Didn't know until now there are tabu > questions. > > You said sometimes a new kernel must be throw in for a quick test. Is > it so time consuming to generate the sha256 for this new kernel, too ?
bsd.rd uses an embedded sha256 file, and so do the other bootable images. So if a kernel is changed, all bootable images need to be regenerated. Often that's not worth the trouble. > Note please that I'm not judge the process or the developers, I'm just > asking. Forget about atomic thing in ftp servers, I got it right some > time ago, without help. I was able to see this looking at the files > date: it is updated at each refresh if the server is in an update > process. > > I really don't know why developers are so jumpy when it comes about a > question. I know, computer things are time consuming, if you feel you > don't have the time please don't bother to answer. Maybe some other > people know the issue and they have some time to explain. Not to me > only, to the list. Bytheway, did you figure out why this cksum thing > is comming over and over - because it was not explained from the first > time. And it is not clear even now. Maybe some of user will eventually > get a clue glueing all the answer scattered on this list and FAQ. > > Thanks Well, a lot of the answers you could have found yourself. -0tto