IMHO spam should be dealt with only on the client, not on the server. It is not the task of the server to determine what is spam and what is not. I know everyone does it, I used to do it too, but it is wrong.
2014-04-26 16:26 GMT+02:00 Stéphane Guedon <steph...@22decembre.eu>: > Le samedi 26 avril 2014 07:20:19, vous avez écrit : >> Hi John, >> >> At 06:04 26-04-2014, John Cox wrote: >> >Unfortunately the whole point of SPF (unlike Sender-ID which works >> >much better and on much the same principles) is that you can reject >> >the message before receiving it so you wouldn't have the DKIM stuff >> >(which I think requires you to have the entire message?). >> >> SPF allows processing using envelope information. DKIM processing >> can only occur after the entire message has been received. >> >> Regards, >> -sm > > I am myself in need for a good antispam solution with opensmtpd. > > if dkim (which I don't use yet) and spf are not really working, what's > the good way (I am already using spamd, not enough !) -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
