On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 19:39:28 +0200 Alexander Schrijver wrote: > > Yeah I'm not sure whether it is worth the effort but I was thinking if > > a user has set a localhost as the nameserver then can we be very close > > to certain that they are not going to change the resolv.conf? > > Having two DNS resolvers behave completely different because they're using > different configuration data seems confusing and dangerous to me.
In the localhost case? Changing your DNS randomly on a mail server seems confusing and dangerous to me. As a client well shouldn't you be using crypto/submission and not trusting DNS in any way? All I am wondering is how many use base unbound or a static setup with opensmtpd and if there should atleast be a nob to turn chroot on/off? -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
