On Jan 2, 2019 9:43 AM, mabi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Wednesday, January 2, 2019 3:16 PM, Edgar Pettijohn 
> <edgar@pettijohn-webcom> wrote:
>
> > I recently switched to dspam. It ties into smtpd very similarly to amavis 
> > Plus it doesn't appear to need the additional <recipients> table, and 
> > delimeters still work out of the box. Everything you need to know is 
> > included in the README plus the specific readme for postgres backend.
>
> I heard good things too about dspam, call me crazy maybe but for me Amavis in 
> combination with ClamAV and SpamAssassin has been doing a great job.
>
> > I'm pretty sure that's why I stopped using amavis originally. It is very 
> > easy cause problems.
>
> I just would like to precise here that it is not Amavis the source of the 
> "problem" in my specific case here but the fact that using an rcpt-to with a 
> recipients table in a match rule does not take in account e-mail addresses 
> containing a plus character. In my opinion it should allow e-mail adresses 
> with a plus or at least it should be a boolean parameter which one can turn 
> on/off in smtpd.conf.
>
> @Gilles maybe you have any comments about that?

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.3/functions-matching.html

You will likely need to use some of the regex functions to pull out the user 
and domain from 
$1.b��yǢ��m�+&j)[yƮ�쨹�޲��r��y�h�+����kiv��N�����r��zǧu���[h�+��칻�&ޢ���kiv��

Reply via email to