On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:29:34AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > On 7/23/19 11:58 AM, Gilles Chehade wrote: > > Hello people, > > > > The portable branch of OpenSMTPD should build with OpenSSL again as long > > as your system is using >= 1.1.x > > > > This is excellent news. I highly appreciate the new portable > version. This solves a lot of problems in my environment. >
great ;-) > > OpenSMTPD portable has been built and tested with Ubuntu only, please do > > provide feedback ! > > > > On a first build (Debian 9) configure returned an error > > checking if programs using libevent functions will link... no > checking openssl/opensslv.h usability... yes > checking openssl/opensslv.h presence... yes > checking for openssl/opensslv.h... yes > configure: error: *** Can't find recent LibreSSL libcrypto (see config.log > for details) *** > > > but actually libevent was missing: > > : > configure:19442: checking openssl/opensslv.h usability > configure:19442: gcc -c -g -O2 -fPIC -DPIC -Wall -Wpointer-arith > -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess > -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-result -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-builtin-memset > -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -I/usr/local/ssl/include conftest.c >&5 > configure:19442: $? = 0 > configure:19442: result: yes > configure:19442: checking openssl/opensslv.h presence > configure:19442: gcc -E -I/usr/local/ssl/include conftest.c > configure:19442: $? = 0 > configure:19442: result: yes > configure:19442: checking for openssl/opensslv.h > configure:19442: result: yes > configure:19468: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -fPIC -DPIC -Wall -Wpointer-arith > -Wuninitialized -Wsign-compare -Wformat-security -Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess > -Wno-pointer-sign -Wno-unused-result -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-builtin-memset > -D_BSD_SOURCE -D_DEFAULT_SOURCE -I/usr/local/ssl/include > -L/usr/local/ssl/lib conftest.c -lcrypto -lssl -levent -lasr -lcrypt > -lresolv >&5 > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -levent > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > : > > After installing the missing package it built fine. > This is a known issue, I'm working on simplifying the configure layer as a there is a lot of room for improvement. I have tried to tackle this multiple times but not successfully yet ;-) > I will check runtime ASAP. > Great ! Keep on providing feedback please ! -- Gilles Chehade @poolpOrg https://www.poolp.org patreon: https://www.patreon.com/gilles -- You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscr...@opensmtpd.org
