Why The Former Energy Secretary Should Keep His Mouth Shut
By Jeff Siegel | Tuesday, January 20th, 2009
 
How appropriate it was to hear Sam Bodman, the Energy Secretary under the 
Bush administration, make the following statement last week in regards to 
Obama's 
plan to double our output of renewable energy in three years.... 
"I think it's going to be extremely difficult to get there in three years. 
I'm not saying you can't do it. It depends on how much money you spend. We have 
spent a lot of money, but could you spend even more and can you throw more 
(government) money at it? You could. I don't think it's wise myself, because I 
think we're spending about at the rate which makes sense." 
Well certainly we should listen to what Bodman thinks is wise and what is 
not. After all, while he attempts to interfere with progress by making such 
statements, our entire energy infrastructure is crumbling, our natural gas 
supplies 
continue to dwindle, we don't have nearly enough engineers and skilled labor 
to expand nuclear development the way they claim we can, and our 
decision-makers (until very recently) have been under the false assumption that 
we have 250 
years worth of coal reserves. That's what happens when you allow lobbyists to 
present you with data and dictate your policies. 
So excuse me if I think Bodman should keep his mouth shut at this point, and 
let the new administration at least attempt to make some progress here.  
Listen: Certainly no one should expect such a massive transition to be easy 
or cheap, but to downplay it from the start (the way Bodman did) represents 
nothing more than a defeatist attitude, likely based on the former Energy 
Secretary's lack of desire to effectively begin the process of transitioning 
our 
energy infrastructure to one that is cleaner and more sustainable.  
Of course, just this past Friday, International Energy Agency Executive 
Director, Nobuo Tanaka told Reuters that while Obama's plan is very ambitious, 
it 
is also attainable. According to Tanaka, mobilizing the private sector to 
invest is a key issue, and a framework or incentives is very important. 
We couldn't agree more. And given the reality of our _fossil fuel depletion_ 
(http://www.angelnexus.com/o/web/10644) , there is little doubt that the new 
administration - complete with its loyal renewable energy supporters on both 
sides of the aisle - will now move forward with a framework and incentives to 
spark large-scale renewable energy development. 
Of course, as investors, we also need to remember that this is a global 
transition. And while the naysayers will continue to pound their fists to 
thinning 
crowds, we will focus on the data that proves renewable energy integration - 
on a global scale - is not only happening...but will continue to happen at a 
rapid pace.  
The most recent data, by the way, comes from the offshore wind sector. 
Offshore Opportunities 
According to GlobalData, only four countries accounted for a share of total 
offshore wind power in 2000. These were Denmark, the Netherlands, the UK, and 
Sweden. As of 2008, however, twelve countries have installed offshore wind 
farms, moving the industry from 35 MW in 2000 to 1,484 MW in 2008. 
Over the next two years, the world's offshore wind power installed capacity 
is expected to reach more than 6,400 MW. This will account for more than eight 
percent of the total wind power capacity additions in 2009 and 2010. 
So which countries are going to take the lead this year? And more 
importantly, which companies will be developing these offshore giants? 
The UK, which was the largest contributor in 2008 (in terms of cumulative 
offshore wind power capacity), has nine new projects expected to reach 
completion 
by 2010. With a cumulative installed capacity of 1396 MW, the developers 
include...
**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to