Your right anyone that espouses that mindset is a little off their rocker. On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 11:09 PM, <larmelt...@aol.com> wrote:
> *I personally don't care if the Government snoops into my email. Fact is. > I wish they would read my emails. But they don't.* > *I can tell Roy Blunt or Oboma that they are as dumb as a three old > African baby in person or by email. Don't matter to me. It would be easier > to tell them by email because it is hard to find them so Ya can talk to them > in person.* > *What makes to difference. They don't understand either way.* > *Even Greg Burris cant understand plain English. Written or spoken. So > what is the problem here?* > *If I thought the FBI or CIA or some ABC boys would get my email to Oboma > I would write emails like a duck on a June bug.* > *Take this email. Oboma is a terrorist and Roy Blunt is screwing you by > using the IRS code to live off of your money.* > *Want'a bet? This email will fall off the face of the earth and no one > will give a crap.* > *Support the Fairtax and remove the IRS.* > *Larry Melton* > ** > In a message dated 4/11/2009 3:22:51 PM Central Daylight Time, > evou...@pobox.com writes: > > On Apr 11, 2009, at 3:13 PM, tom wrote: > > > Keep the government from snooping in our e-mail > > By Examiner Editorial > > - 4/9/09 > > > > Civilian libertarians were apoplectic over former President George > > W. Bush’s “warrantless wiretap” program, which sought to monitor > > communications from terrorist networks overseas. So why are they not > > screaming bloody murder now that President Barack Obama appears > > slated to receive unprecedented power to monitor all Internet > > traffic without a warrant and to even shut the system down > > completely on the pretext of national security? The Cybersecurity > > Act of 2009 - introduced by Senate Intelligence Committee chairman > > Jay Rockefeller, D-WV, and cosponsor Olympia Snowe, R-ME - bypasses > > all existing privacy laws and allows White House political > > operatives to tap into any online communication without a warrant, > > including banking, medical, and business records and personal e-mail > > conversations. This amounts to warrantl [snipped] > > Yes, we need to oppose this, but we also need to simply make it > harder. More people need to routinely use personal encryption products > everywhere they can. This will make it much more labor intensive to > gather this kind of information and police will actually have to > perform old-fashioned police work to decide what information it is > really necessary to pursue. Additionally, using this personal > encryption helps prevent criminals from piggy-backing on police > surveillance and data-mining for identity theft and scams: Anything > the government collects, CRIMINALS WILL HAVE. > > ** > > ------------------------------ > *A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy > steps!<http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1220572838x1201387489/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fwww.freecreditreport.com%2Fpm%2Fdefault.aspx%3Fsc%3D668072%26hmpgID%3D62%26bcd%3DAprilfooterNO62%22> > * > > > > -- http://votetom4council.webs.com/ www.moliberty.org http://417-political-pundit.blogspot.com The power to tax involves the power to destroy. ~Justice John Marshall~ Just because you do not take an interest in politics doesn't mean politics won't take an interest in you! -Pericles (430 B.C.) "no cause is lost if there is but one fool to fight for it" ~Will Turner~ ~Pirate's of the Caribbean @ World's End~ A legislative act contrary to the Constitution is not law. ~Justice John Marshall~ http://www.radiofreeliberty.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members. If you do not like what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave. If you leave, learn how to do this for yourself. If you do not, you will be here forever. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
