The Immigration Problem We're Not Talking About

 

http://cdn.thefiscaltimes.com/cdn/farfuture/_89eRQ3pyJNYkMBH2KIyIl_hvoQVn8xa
MG8cdWMZbq4/mtime:1378418532/sites/default/files/styles/article_hero/public/
articles/01102013_illegal_immigration_article.jpg?itok=VKp7ABLO

REUTERS/Joshua Lott

 <http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/print/66045> Printer-friendly version
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/printpdf/66045> PDF version

a a 

 

Type Size: Small

By Rob Garver <http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Authors/G/Rob-Garver> ,

The Fiscal Times

July 28, 2014

One of the biggest factors driving the surge of unaccompanied children
making the dangerous journey from Central America to the United States'
Southern border has been the incorrect impression that, once they arrive,
they will be allowed to stay. Unfortunately, by vastly understaffing the
country's immigration courts, the U.S. government has made that myth appear
to be reality.

Imagine this. What if the first wave of children in this migration of tens
of thousands had been deported back to Honduras, El Salvador, or Guatemala a
few months after they left home in the first place? It seems likely that
word would have got around that, contrary to rumor, the United States was
not providing blanket amnesty to children.

Related:
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/27/Plans-Send-National-Guard
-Border-Spark-Controversy>   National Guard Border Fix Is Fraught With
Danger

In fact, according to the Economic Policy Institute in Washington, the vast
majority of unaccompanied children crossing the border are designated for
deportation once they come before a judge. The problem is that wait time for
a hearing in immigration court is measured not in weeks or months, but in
years.

According to Syracuse University's Transactional Records Access
Clearinghouse (TRAC), there was a backlog of 375,503 cases
<http://trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/court_backlog/>  in the
immigration court system as of the end of June. That's more than twice the
number of pending cases in 2008. It also translates into an average wait
time, according to TRAC, of 587 days for an initial hearing, with wait times
in some jurisdictions averaging much longer.

In Omaha, for instance, the average case takes 839 days to get in front of a
judge. In Los Angeles, it's 820, and in Phoenix it's 808. And these are just
averages. Immigration activists report some children waiting three to five
years for a hearing. Worse yet, in some cases, the initial hearing is only
part of the process; some drag on for years even after they first come
before a judge.

Part of the reason is that the federal immigration court system is gravely
understaffed when considering the magnitude of the task in front of it.
There are currently about 243 immigration judges, or one to every 1,545
pending cases.

Related: Jeb Bush Warns GOP on Immigration Reform
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/24/Jeb-Bush-Warns-GOP-Immigr
ation-Reform> 

This means that families in Central America who send their children north
can report to friends and neighbors that those kids are in the United States
and aren't coming back anytime soon, creating an incentive for other parents
to send their children on the perilous trip.

The worst part about this is that it was a completely predictable and
avoidable problem.

There is a growing call among those most concerned about the influx of
illegal immigrants to amend the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims
Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, which many blame for the current
crisis on the Southern border. Originally passed in 2000, and meant to
protect the victims of human trafficking from being returned to dangerous
circumstances, the law barred the immediate deportation of children who
enter the US illegally, and who are not from Mexico or Canada. The
immigration caseload, flat or declining in the years immediately before
2000, has been on a nearly uninterrupted rise ever since.

But all the law guarantees is a hearing - not amnesty. And the passage of a
law promising a hearing to a large segment of illegal immigrants who would
not otherwise be entitled to one ensured an increased workload for the
immigration court system - a promise the U.S. government largely ignored.

Related: Perry Tests Obama by Sending Troops to the Border
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/23/Perry-Tests-Obama-Sending
-Troops-Border> 

"It's sort of ironic the one part of the immigration system that is
underfunded is the one that provides due process to immigrants," said Daniel
Costa, Director of Immigration Law and Policy Research for the Economic
Policy Institute in Washington. In recent years, he said, funding for
immigration enforcement operations increased 300 percent - that's the part
of the system charged with apprehending illegal immigrants and bringing them
before a judge. Over the same time frame, said Costa, the funding for the
courts rose only 70 percent.

"If there wasn't an immigration court crisis, there wouldn't really be a
border crisis," said Costa. "The crisis is that we can't provide everybody
with a hearing. If they were being processed in an orderly fashion - if
their cases were being processed in 60, 90, or 100 days, I don't know if
people would be making so much noise about it."

President Obama's $4 billion proposal to address the crisis on the border
would allow for the hiring of a few dozen judges. A more expansive proposal
being pushed by Sen. Barbara Mikulski would provide for substantially more.
Given the backlog, though, there's no likelihood, in the near term, of
changing the impression many potential illegal immigrants have that, simply
by crossing the border, they will get to stay in the U.S. indefinitely.

Reducing the backlog is going to take years - even with additional funding,
said Costa. "Even if you to double or triple the immigration judges you
aren't going to do it overnight."

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times

*
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/27/EU-Agrees-Russia-Sanction
s-US-Could-Arm-Ukraine> EU Agrees to Russia Sanctions; US Could Arm Ukraine
*
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/25/Chikungunya-and-Other-Dis
eases-You-Now-Have-Worry-About> Chikungunya, and Other Diseases You Now Have
to Worry About
*
<http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/24/Paul-Ryan-s-State-Based-P
overty-Plan-Could-Assure-Two-Americas> Paul Ryan's State-Based Poverty Plan
Could Assure "Two Americas"

 <http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Authors/G/Rob-Garver>
http://cdn.thefiscaltimes.com/cdn/farfuture/s-i_9_ICO6DjIBRgggA5Ut2MKDuB9NwK
4wWud5M8Emk/mtime:1390510470/sites/default/files/styles/author_bio/public/Ro
b%20Garver.jpg?itok=xWQGn9tj

Rob Garver <http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Authors/G/Rob-Garver>  

Follow on Twitter <https://twitter.com/rrgarver>  

A longtime reporter on the intersection of the federal government and the
private sector, Rob Garver is National Correspondent, based in Washington,
D.C. He has written for ProPublica, The New York Times and other
publications. 

- See more at:
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articles/2014/07/28/Immigration-Problem-We-re-
Not-Talking-About#sthash.vCXJPXOx.dpuf

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
This is a Free Speech forum. The owner of this list assumes no responsibility 
for the intellectual or emotional maturity of its members.  If you do not like 
what is being said here, filter it to trash, ignore it or leave.  If you leave, 
learn how to do this for yourself.  If you do not, you will be here forever.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"missourilibertycoalition" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to missourilibertycoalition+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to