I can write it, but I can't test it. On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Chris Hanson<[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed, though it should be called STRING-HEAD! and take only two arguments. > > On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Taylor R Campbell<[email protected]> wrote: >> Rather than changing each instance of SET-STRING-MAXIMUM-LENGTH! to >> check whether it worked and to use SUBSTRING if it failed, perhaps it >> would be better to add a SUBSTRING! procedure to do this. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel >
-- ~jrm _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
