Just a comment on these more aggressive optimizations. It'd be nice if the optimizations were rule-based rather than having these deep, ad-hoc conditionals. Then the description of the transform would *be* the transform.
Would it be possible to get the *parser to involved here to simplify this sort of stuff? (I'm not suggesting that this patch be rewritten that way, I'm just thinking it'd be a nice thing to have.) -- ~jrm _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
