> Comments? I agree with your recommendation.
On a related note, in a recent build, I noticed some of my code failing sporadically to find certain values in EQ hash tables. Depending on the order in which the code was loaded, one particular symbol value would be missing from one such table, which was used to represent a set of symbols. I haven't had a chance to track that down. I did spend a few hours trying to create a reproducible test case, but failed. Could this have been caused by the keys being held weakly? In this hash table, the keys are symbols and the values are always #t. _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
