That all sounds good. I've been planning to eliminate most of the "efficiency" hacks in scode.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Joe Marshall <[email protected]> wrote: > Unless anyone objects, I'm going to fix up and simplify SF. There's a > bunch of stuff > in there that really ought to go (and I'm embarrassed to say that I'm the > one that put it there. I found a bug that must date back to 1987 or so.) > > Also, I have a question. Is there any reason to retain `SEQUENCE_3'? > It's a slight performance tweak for the interpreter, but completely > unnecessary these days. If it's ok with everyone, I'll make the Scheme > code stop generating them and we can remove the C code support > later on. > > -- > ~jrm > > > _______________________________________________ > MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel > _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
