> From: Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> > Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 02:13:56 +0000 > > [...] > > It would be more cool if floenv.scm set up the machine with a default > environment, via libc. It would be more "portable" (modulo > portabilitatedness of fenv.h), no? > > I don't understand. Can you elaborate? We already use libc to > control the floating-point environment if we can, and only fall back > to machine-specific code if we can't.
Yes, sorry. "More cool" was calling flo:set-environment! (libc) in savres.scm and make.scm, and removing the (non-libc) fpu inits. Less cool was "just mask DENORM". The former seems more portabicklish, assuming fenv.h is not a stranger to most. _______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
