Found another typo in the description of signal-condition. Greetings, Peter
From 61bb14a32a8183645b73eefdbe90da32966ac64a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Feigl <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 09:30:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] fixing typo: duplicated word "creates"
---
doc/ref-manual/error.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/doc/ref-manual/error.texi b/doc/ref-manual/error.texi
index c97063e..0b66105 100644
--- a/doc/ref-manual/error.texi
+++ b/doc/ref-manual/error.texi
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@ signalled it is best to actually put a breakpoint on entry to
@vindex standard-error-hook
@cindex REP loop
Called internally by @code{error} after it calls
-@code{signal-condition}. Normally creates creates a new @sc{repl} with
+@code{signal-condition}. Normally creates a new @sc{repl} with
the prompt @code{"error>"} (but see @code{standard-error-hook}). In
order to simulate the effect of calling @code{error}, code may call
@code{signal-condition} directly and then call
--
1.7.10
pgpLJ75FLdiFi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
