I meant compliance with that part of R7RS. I don't expect us to have full compliance any time soon.
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Matt Birkholz <p...@birchwood-abbey.net>wrote: > > From: Chris Hanson <c...@chris-hanson.org> > > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 22:40:01 -0800 > > > > R7RS defines parameters, which we'll eventually need to implement anyway > > for compliance. Converting the system's bindings over to parameters is > > probably the right thing for a variety of reasons. > > Then I will stick it to master, one binding per commit. > > Comply with R7RS? Does it not require multiple-value returns? >
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list MIT-Scheme-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
