And I have another TODO item to address the problem with select-on-bytes-per-word using the host implementation to decide what size the target is. We have several issues with cross compilation.
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:37 PM Taylor R Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > > Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:14:40 -0800 > > From: Chris Hanson <[email protected]> > > > > Yeah, I'm puzzled by that one too. I didn't have time to chase it down > > before the release. > > Seems to me the right thing to do is: > > 1. Invent FASL_ARCH_SVM1. > 2. Teach the cross-compiler to spit it out. > > After all, as I understand it, the fasl architecture is relevant only > for compiled code. Maybe there'll be a byte ordering issue too but > that can probably be smoothed out in fasl.c for SVM1. > > The cross-fasdump branch is an attempt to do something like (2); maybe > it can be revived. >
_______________________________________________ MIT-Scheme-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mit-scheme-devel
