|
Hi Tim
Its not been that often. The number of nodes
supported increased significantly at about Version 5 or 5.5. Also complex
objects ( where points and lines can appear as one record etc ) about six or
seven.
Its good and bad news really. I think had they done
more on the format as technology of processors and disk capacities improved they
would have had a killer app. However as I "moaned about" before they
seem to be resigning themselves to rendering Oracle at present.
If you split desktop GIS into rendering, analysis
and storage, then consider client server is more efficient with analysis done as
stored procedures on the server right next to the data, then giving up the
storage is a bold decision, especially when you have a very good one to
start with.
The way the format is currently designed it is
fairly easy to work out a new object type as it is introduced but as you suggest
this could change at any time in the future. However it hasn't really changed
since we started working with it about 1993. The early work in particular is a
very elegant implementation of textbook RTREE theory.
It will be interesting to see what happens when
Project Grande appears.
Cheers
Bob
__._,_.___
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___ |
Title: Message
- Re: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Daniel Morissette
- Re: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Bob Young
- RE: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Tim Smith
- Re: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Daniel Morissette
- RE: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Tim Smith
- RE: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Tim Smith
- RE: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Tim Smith
- Re: [mitab] Locating features in a particular area Bob Young
