Dear guoyanmin (is that your name?),

what you describe and show in the photo is the normal interpolation of missing 
slices.
When you delete the segmentation in slice 50, the interpolation mechanism 
notices that
this slice is empty and suggests an interpolation. This interpolation has the 
same shape
as the deleted segmentation because of the way you originally created the 
segmentation.

Regards
Daniel


-----Original Message-----
From: guoyanmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/16/2008 10:28 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mitk-users] MITK BUG, please give me some tipp
 

hallo every one 
i have found one mitk BUG, i set the segmentation into a data volume, for 
example in slice 45 and slice 56  at one of direction, after that i use 
interpolate Tools to interpolate between of them. after all i use the 
segmentation's Erase Tool to delete the segmentation from slice 50, it is 
successful,but the contour of segmentation stays always in the slice,if i 
change the slice from 50 to 51 use mouse and want to do some things in the 
other slices, then the program is crashed.
anybody can tell me, how about this bug, how i can take this away, because i 
implement also another functions, it looks like this. i add one photo to show 
you, how about the contour.


in this photo i show you in every 3 direction this is alway the contour in the 
slice Image,but it is not my wish, it could also let the program crash.





_________________________________________________________________
MSN ???,????????,???????
http://cn.msn.com



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to