Hi Sebastian, We now have a dartclient with VC8.0 running, which compiles the QT4 version of MITK + openCherry (the machine is name mbi030). (Un)fortunately, it compiles fine and I do not see the error you reported. If I get my hands on another Visual Studio 2005 installation, I will try again. Sorry for not having a solution right now.
I will point out some material to read in my reply to Fucangs email for a better understanding of openCherry and the concepts behind it. The main motivation, though, is to decouple the components of an application as far as possible and to hide implementation details (and to allow different implementations for a given "service" interface). The service concept and the extension point concept are complementary ideas. With the implementation and registration of your service at a central "service registry", you serve some functionality/logic to clients without forcing the client to add a dependency to your code. With extension points you can gather "information" from multiple sources (plugins) without knowing something about them (the plugins "extend" your extension point by providing information via XML). Most of the SOA hype is related to Web applications, where you transfer services across networks to clients. Although this could be done in C++ too (it is not implemented in the openCherry service framework), we concentrate on so called "rich client applications", where the plug-ins are all located on the same machine and executed in the same process. Regards, Sascha > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: sebastian ordas [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. April 2009 00:01 > An: [email protected] > Cc: Zelzer Sascha > Betreff: Re: [mitk-users] very recent OpenCherry compilation error > > Hi Sascha, > > Actually I did not have time yet to look into it, so I just comment it > out for now ... > > btw, I was wondering if you could suggest some tutorial or bibliography > on "service-based" applications like the one you are implementing in > openCherry > > I'm not a "pure" software engineer so I found hard to understand the > "philosophy" or main motivation behind this kind of applications. > > In my understanding, the idea is to have an application that can > centralize the required computing power and let users run a "client" > remotely, right? > > thanks > sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
