Hi Sascha,
Thank you very much! After reading your tutorial, I think open cherry is
valuable for flexible software
development. I will consider whether or not we will choose it for a small
scale project counterbalancing
its flexibility and complexity.
Fucang
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Zelzer Sascha
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Fucang,
>
> there is now an openCherry wiki page on www.mitk.org (
> http://www.mitk.org/wiki/OpenCherry). I hope you find the answers to your
> questions there. If not, feel free to ask again on the mailing list.
>
> Regards,
> Sascha
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jia Fucang [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Do 09.04.2009 12:19
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [mitk-users] Tutorials on Open Cherry
>
> Dear MITK developers,
>
> As Sebastian said, Open Cherry is a new platform to all, would you guys
> recommend books or materials for
> users to have a look, to judge whether or not to use opencherry and Qt
> 4.5.0, or only use Qt 4.5.0. I think qt3
> mainapp is a good framework for application R&D, but not know how much
> effort should be used to make QT 4.5
> compatible to it? If Open cherry do not have cliff study curve for C++
> engineers who have no JAVA or ECLIPSE RCP
> knowledge, I would like to study it. If one need a lot of time to grasp
> it, one should consider the project item member's
> acceptability. Since you guys work on opencherry, we wonder to know your
> experience, the pros and cons of OpenCherry.
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Fucang
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
