I ended up refactoring the code to use avoid the need to translate between
MITK and ITK point sets. But it's possible that I'll encounter the need for
this again in the future in which case I'll use solution (1) to do so.
Thanks,
Taylor
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Kislinskiy, Stefan <
s.kislins...@dkfz-heidelberg.de> wrote:
> Hi Taylor,
>
> yes we are interested and we would appreciate such a contribution. :) We
> discussed the options you listed below and concluded that we would prefer a
> non-member function solution (1).
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Stefan
>
>
>
> *Von:* Taylor Braun-Jones [mailto:tay...@braun-jones.org]
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015 17:25
> *An:* mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> *Betreff:* [mitk-users] Convenience methods for importing/exporting
> itk::PointSet to/from mitk::PointSet
>
>
>
> Hello mitk-users,
>
>
>
> Would the team be interested in adding code to MITK Core that makes it
> easier to work with both MITK and ITK point sets? If so, what would be the
> preferred implementation? Some options:
>
>
>
> (1) Adapter classes and functions (a
> la mitk::CastToItkImage, mitk::ImportItkImage)
>
> (2) Adding a constructor to mitk::PointSet that takes an itk::PointSet as
> an argument
>
> (3) Adding a method such as mitk::PointSet::GetItkPointSet(int t = 0)
>
> (4) Something else?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Taylor
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
