Hi JC,

the fibers in MITK are always represented as points in physical space without any transform. We simply hand the vtkPolydata, which contains the fiber points in world coordinates, to the mapper. No additional transform is applied. When saving fibers in vtk/vtp format, a possible transform is not preserved anyway. The format does not support that directly as far as I know.

Peter


On 22.04.2015 21:00, Jean-Christophe Houde wrote:
Hi Caspar,

it all makes sense. However, that raises another semi-related question: we are currently coding a loader for the .tck streamlines format. The .tck format (at least from mrtrix version 0.2) saves the points in world space, using the underlying image transform as the reference. So, normally, points are saved as RAS.

When reading the file, we take the file as-is, and put the points in a vtkPolyData without doing any transform. What is surprising is that, even though MITK uses a LPS coordinate system, our points (which follow a RAS coordinate system) are displayed exactly in the correct spot...

Therefore, I'm wondering if there is any additional transform that is done by the rendering code, or if there is another aspect I didn't take into account...

Best,

--
Jean-Christophe

2015-04-22 13:25 GMT-04:00 Goch, Caspar Jonas <c.g...@dkfz-heidelberg.de <mailto:c.g...@dkfz-heidelberg.de>>:

    Hi Jean-Christophe,

    MITK uses ITK for a lot of the image loading and Nifti in
    particular [1,2]. Due to that it shares ITK’s preferred
    orientation LPS. AFAIK the q/sform uses RAS as a standard, so the
    flip is probably due to ITK conversions as you assumed.

    Does this answer your question?

    Best,

    Caspar

    [1] http://www.itk.org/Doxygen/html/classitk_1_1NiftiImageIO.html

    [2] http://www.itk.org/Doxygen/html/classitk_1_1ImageIOBase.html

    *Von:*Jean-Christophe Houde
    [mailto:jean.christophe.ho...@gmail.com
    <mailto:jean.christophe.ho...@gmail.com>]
    *Gesendet:* Mittwoch, 22. April 2015 17:07
    *An:* mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
    <mailto:mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
    *Betreff:* [mitk-users] Orientation and transforms question

    Hi everyone,

    I would like to have some clarifications on the interpretation of
    orientations and transforms in Mitk. First, what is the preferred
    orientation in MITK? LPS, RAS, or something else?

    Secondly, there always seems to be some modifications applied to
    the affines of my images when I load them. When looking at the
    affine information in the Nifti image available in [1], using
    fslhd, I get a qform of

    qform_code     1

    qto_xyz:1      1.000000  -0.000000  0.000000  -125.834106

    qto_xyz:2      0.000000  1.000000  -0.000000  -103.860718

    qto_xyz:3      0.000000  0.000000  1.000000  -53.192493

    qto_xyz:4      0.000000  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000

    and a sform of

    sform_code     1

    sto_xyz:1      1.000000  0.000000  -0.000000  -125.834106

    sto_xyz:2      0.000000  1.000000  -0.000000  -103.860718

    sto_xyz:3      0.000000  0.000000  1.000000  -53.192493

    sto_xyz:4      0.000000  0.000000  0.000000  1.000000

    which are exactly the same, save for some -0 switched to 0 and
    vice-versa. Those switches should have no effect, at least to my
    knowledge.

    However, when loading this image in a software built on Mitk
    (based on release 2014.10), the IndexToWorld transform shown in
    the details of the image is

    IndexToWorldTransform:

    Matrix: -1   0 -0

                -0 -1   0

                 0   0  1

    Offset: [125.834, 103.861, -53.1925]

    Clearly, there is a -1 factor on the 2 first rows of the transform
    (and therefore, on the offset as well). I guess it's a transform
    to go from RAS to LPS? If so, is this always applied on Nifti
    images, or there are some specific cases?

    This really has some implications when we want to save, for
    example, a VTK polydata file in a tool outside of Mitk, and the
    load it inside Mitk.

    Thanks for your time!

    [1] https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/53085014/mitk/t1.nii.gz

    ---

    Jean-Christophe Houde, M.Sc.

    Research assistant

    Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Lab

    Sherbrooke University



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to