Hi,

edgeColor and edgeVisibility have nothing to do with selected node display. Does the color change when you select the data node in the Data Manager? Or when you manually set the "selected" flag in the properties view?

I don't know what do you mean by ATT files - perhaps it was in a different thread.

Rostislav.

On 09/06/2015 08:04, Pukhlikov Mikhail wrote:
I see that it's calling `vtkSetMacro(EdgeVisibility, int);` , first question is resolved.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: mikhail.pukhli...@outlook.com
To: rostislav.khlebni...@kcl.ac.uk; iweg...@gmx.de; mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:18:38 +0400
Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Draw contour around model

Hello again,

From what I see with diff this code just addds management for "material.edgeColor" and "material.edgeVisibility" but for now I don't get how they are handled.

I've used to build MITK with those changes and they are added to polygonal model but nothing happens when I turn it on / off.

For ATT... files I'm getting error: `core.io.ioUtil ERROR: No reader available for 'F:\X\ATT00001'`
But maybe it's because my MITK base is outdated?

> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:35:59 +0100
> From: rostislav.khlebni...@kcl.ac.uk
> To: iweg...@gmx.de; mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Draw contour around model
>
> Hi Ingmar,
>
> well, basically it's a built-in functionality in VTK, so it's really
> easy to implement. Actually all the necessary code is in the file I sent
> previously :)
>
> Overall, I'm just waiting for the official announcement of 2015.05 to
> finalize integration and start talking about stuff I could contribute.
>
> Cheers,
> Rostislav.
>
> On 08/06/2015 20:25, Wegner wrote:
> > Hi Rostislav,
> > is "edgeVisibility" your property to show mesh edges of a surace as well?
> > I was thinking about adding a render mode that combines surface
> > representation with wireframe representation. Do you already have that
> > feature added to your fork?
> > If so would you share the rest of the implementation? I could also
> > isolate it and create a pull request in your name in my fork.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ingmar ;)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Am 08.06.2015 um 12:05 schrieb Rostislav Khlebnikov:
> >> There you go. My version also has a property to show edges on the
> >> surface, but it doesn't come into play unless you set the property
> >> "material.edgeVisibility" to true, so don't worry about this.
> >>
> >> Rostislav.
> >>
> >> On 08/06/2015 11:00, Pukhlikov Mikhail wrote:
> >>> Thank you, may you show the specific code for "mitkSurfaceVtkMapper3D
> >>> to apply a yellow color if the "selected" flag was set for the
> >>> surface" implementation
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 09:09:28 +0100
> >>> From: rostislav.khlebni...@kcl.ac.uk
> >>> To: mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Draw contour around model
> >>>
> >>> Hi Mikhail,
> >>>
> >>> I think that displaying a selected data object is the data object's
> >>> mapper job. For surfaces, I modified the mitkSurfaceVtkMapper3D to
> >>> apply a yellow color if the "selected" flag was set for the surface.
> >>> Alternatively, you can just manually set the color once a node is
> >>> selected - but the mapper way is more robust.
> >>>
> >>> Regarding the dependencies - it's pretty easy to pull dependencies to
> >>> your plugin - just add "PACKAGE_DEPENDS VTK" to the
> >>> MACRO_CREATE_MITK_CTK_PLUGIN in the CMakeLists.txt of your plugin and > >>> the dependency will be there - i.e. all headers will be available and > >>> libraries will be linked with your plugin. Also, what you're trying to
> >>> do looks more like VTK's job rather than ITK's.
> >>>
> >>> Rostislav.
> >>>
> >>> On 08/06/2015 07:11, Pukhlikov Mikhail wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Is there fast way to draw a contour around the model. I'm trying
> >>> to implement locally selection mechanism and I think about fast
> >>> way to display selection on 3D multiwidgety view. I was thinking
> >>> about applieng some ITK filters maybe but it's way to slow and
> >>> complicated since I need to get ITK deps into display interactor
> >>> for doing it and it will work slow. May you suggest fast way how
> >>> can I show selection of specific data node (model) in 3D view of
> >>> multiwidget?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> mitk-users mailing list
> >>> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> <mailto:mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing
> >>> list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> mitk-users mailing list
> >> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users
> >>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> mitk-users mailing list
> mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ mitk-users mailing list mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
mitk-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to