On Saturday 25 Jan 2003 8:31 pm, Robert Kesterson wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Jan 2003, Matti Haveri wrote:
> > The first three places were taken by TMPGEnc, ProCoder and Digital
> > Media Press. mpeg2enc did rather well, too.
> >
> > <http://www.tfdvd.com/public/156.cfm>
>
> A few days ago, I did a comparison of mpeg2enc vs CCE, which is supopsedly
> *the* enocder to use for high end work, just for my own amusement. I came
> across a website someplace (sorry, I forget the URL) that compared various
> encoders and also inclxuded the DV and the encoded results for each
> encoder. So I grabbed the DV and compared for myself. To my eyes,
> mpeg2enc did just as good a job at -q 4, though the file size was about
> 50% larger. At -q 6, the file size was very similar, and the quality was
> *almost* as good (you could start to see some block noise in darker
> areas).
Yes. mpeg2enc is definately sub-optimal in allocating bits based on how
likely it is quantisation will show up. It should get better but I have to
improved the internal "infrastructure" first. I will be borrowing a lot of
useful open-source stuff from the MPEG-4 world - not all of it is really
relevant but some will definately make noticeable improvements.
Andrew
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
