Hi -
> From: Charles Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Or is it the case that y4mscaler's 4:1:1 -> 4:2:0 conversion is
> > more accurate (better) than what is currently being done?
>
> I'm sure Matto will give you more info, but it's more related to libdv's
> mangling of the 411 data in the NTSC frames to produce 422, which is in
> turn is managled to 420 for mjpeg tools...
Ah, ok - I did not realize that libdv was going thru an intermediate
422 stage!
Hmmm, I wonder if y4mscaler can be used simply to do the 411 -> 420
conversion even in the situation where no scaling is being requested.
> Dunno about knowing about it, but I've been testing Matto's patch here
> and no harm has befallen any of the mjpeg tools with his mods yet...
> will run a few more tests before posting to CVS though.
Drop us a line when you've checked in the changes so we know to
"cvs update" the smilutils ;)
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
