On 16 Aug 2003, Florin Andrei wrote:
> Meanwhile i realised i'll have to reconvert anyway, that's an amateur
> video with high detail and LOTS of motion, so i'll probably have to use
> -I 2 instead of -I 1.
> Even at -b 9000, i still get square artifacts, that's how bad it is...
It will, from the sounds of it, probably be necessary to give up
a small amount of the detail. Better that than square artifacts,
no?
Try running the data thru "yuvdenoise -l 1" before going to the
encoder. Perhaps that will help.
Did you try using the -N option? A small value might help,
perhaps something like "-N 0.6" would be useful. Using the
alternate quanization matrices might also be of value - perhaps
they would reduce the block artifacts.
Cheers,
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100003ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
