On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, Dik Takken wrote:

> I noticed something strange while playing with mpeg2enc. When I encode a 
> sequence of frames to progressive mpeg2, the output quality is *much* 
> better than when I encode the same image sequence to progressive mpeg2.
        
        Something does not read properly in that paragraph.  How can the
        quality of "progressive mpeg2" be different than "progressive mpeg2"?

> It seems to me that something must be wrong here. I use these 
> options for mpeg2enc:
> 
> ... | mpeg2enc -f 8 -b 9500 -q 1 -a 3 -o output.m2v

        Well - one thing that's wrong is using -q 1.  Known, in some cases,
        to suffer from DCT/iDCT overflow in the MMX/SSE code.  Or are you
        doing the encoding on an PPC system - the Altivec routines seem to 
        not have the same problem.

> When I have png2yuv interpret the frames as top field first interlaced, it 
> produces a mpeg file of the same size, but there are many more compression 
> artifacts. It looks like it has been encoded with -q 10 or something. Why 

        Ah, but are they compression artifacts or interlacing "artifacts"?

        If you're viewing the output on a progressive (i.e. computer monitor)
        display then interlaced data will look poor compared to progressive
        data.  I suspect playing it on an interlaced display such as a TV 
        will likely look different than on a computer monitor.

        Not sure if this will help - it might - but adding "-I 0" for 
        progressive and "-I 1" for interlaced content might make a different
        (doubt it, but worth a try ;))

        Are you using the cvs version, the last release version (1.6.2) or
        an older version?

        I've not seen any compression artifacts on interlaced content - but then
        "-q 3" is as low as I've used (usually -q 4 is sufficient).

        Cheers,
        Steven Schultz



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users

Reply via email to