On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Ray Cole wrote:
> I tried recording at 704x480 and 720x480, and you are correct that if I put
> a piece of paper to measure the size of some objects there is a measurable
> difference. So I suppose I'll start using 704x480 :-) Not that
The thing to try is find something with a lot of (perfect) circles.
> I'll re-record all the stuff I've recorded before since 2% is really hard
> to see, but I guess 704x480 will be the 'correct' way.
I wonder though if the difference might not be 9% - I don't know
if the application is specifying square pixels or not.
An experiment would be to record at 640x480 and do a software resample
(y4mscaler can do it) to 704x480 and then see what it looks like.
Steven Schultz
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Mjpeg-users mailing list
Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
